Cherreads

Chapter 261 - ‘SEE YOU MORNING’ 261 Submission to China Writers Website Rejected 《晓欣卿》261投稿中国作家网被拒

In June 2026, Lin Yuhui found that his long-registered China Writers Website account had been approved, so he went on to publish his own work. For this he also specially wrote a preface, full of deep feeling:

2026年6月,林语晖发现注册已久的中国作家网账号通过了,那就上去发布自己的作品吧,为此他还特意写了个序言,饱含深情:

Respected readers, I, as the author of this book, welcome you who have come here with the most sincere enthusiasm. The full-length novel 'SEE YOU MORNING' is adapted from the life experience I am currently undergoing. It is still being serialized, published globally for free, and can be found by online search (to protect personal privacy, the names of people in the book are all fake).

尊敬的读者,我作为本书作者,以最真挚的热情欢迎来到这里的你."晓欣卿"这部长篇小说是基于我本人正在进行中的人生经历改编的,目前仍在连载中,全球免费发表,网络搜索可得(为保护个人隐私,书中人名都是假的).

This novel tells stories about people and people, stories of human beings, and more unknown stories. It belongs to the categories of science fiction, romance, romance, ethics, and interstellar love, and contains factors such as modern times, contemporary times, the future, and interstellar travel. From the perspective of an ordinary person who has personally experienced the events, it lets one experience a grand timeline narrative of different era backgrounds, regions, the solar system, and interstellar scale.

本小说讲述了关于人与人之间的故事,人类的故事,以及更多未知的故事.属于科幻,言情,浪漫,伦理,星际恋曲范畴,包含近代现代,当代,未来,星际穿越等因素,从事件亲历者的普通人视角,去体验一个不同时代背景,地域,太阳系,星际规模的宏大时间线叙事.

Those who can read my novel are all happy. The pacing of this book is very slow, and there are no satisfying points; the plot has no hooks or reversals, and it even requires you to piece things together yourself. That you can read this work shows that you have time and patience, which in today's impetuous society is itself happiness.

能读我的小说的人都是幸福的.这书节奏很慢,也没有爽点,剧情无钩子或者反转,甚至需要你自己去拼凑.能读这部作品说明您有时间,有耐心,这在当今这个浮躁的社会里本身就是幸福.

Then you can also follow an old man who has gone through the bleakness of life, and in his story, see all the joys and sorrows, partings and reunions of the world, the beatings and setbacks of life, and all kinds of social and collective filth and ugliness. Then you can still tightly guard the last trace of mercy and compassion as a human being in your heart, hold the dignity of life, face the gap between reality and ideal, and rely on your own courage, strength and wisdom to live out your true self, the unique you in the universe. You, are happy.

然后您还能跟随着一个历尽生活惨淡的老男人,在他的故事里,阅尽世事悲欢离合,人生捶打与挫折,种种社会的,群体的肮脏与丑陋.然后还能紧紧守护心中作为人那最后一丝仁慈与悲悯,怀着生命的尊严,直面现实与理想的差距,靠自己的勇气,力量与智慧,活出真实的自己,宇宙中那个独一无二的你.你,就是幸福的.

Between the last ray of evening glow and the first ray of morning light, let us sincerely wish that our world, on the new day, will be even better.

在最后一抹晚霞与第一缕晨曦之间,让我们衷心祝愿我们的世界,在新的一天,更加美好.

——I dedicate this text to the beloved in my heart.

——谨以此文,献给我的心中挚爱.

Author bio: Male born in 1977, height 160cm, weight 51Kg

作者简介:77年男身高160cm体重51Kg

Engineer, kind-hearted, upright and honest, sincere to others, high IQ, IQ 138.

工程师,心地善良正直诚实,待人真诚,智商高 IQ 138.

A week later he went on again to take a look, heh, the submission was rejected; it seemed the editor only read the first chapter. Actually he very much wanted to upload up to Chapter 8 "Sin City", full of humanistic care for vulnerable groups, but before the review was passed only six chapters could be uploaded. But now it seemed it didn't matter anymore.

过了一周他又上去一看,呵呵,拒稿了,似乎编辑只看了第一章.其实他很想上传到第八章"罪恶都市",饱含对弱势群体的人文关怀,但是审核通过前只能上传六章.不过现在看来也无所谓了.

In fact, Lin Yuhui had also briefly looked at the works on that site, a moldy smell of eight-part essay, no one read them at all, and he himself would not go read them anyway.

其实那上面的作品林语晖也简要看过,一股发霉的八股味道,根本没人看,反正自己是不会去看.

It seemed that the China Writers Website and commercial web fiction websites had formed two kinds of ecosystems; one side was the collective's self-indulgence, the other side was the individual's self-indulgence, and the vast majority of the public, caught in the middle, felt nothing toward either of them.

似乎中国作家网和商业网文网站它们形成了两种生态,一边是集体的自嗨,一边是个人的自嗨,绝大多数公众夹在中间对他们都无感.

Lin Yuhui felt that the China Writers Website had not done the job it should of using literature and art to connect with the broad masses; they should also be eating from the official rice bowl, right? He gave them a chance to open up the situation with a good work, yet they did not recognize its worth. Their performance is just like that of the Chinese men's national football team.

林语晖觉得中国作家网没做好他们应该的用文学艺术联系广大群众的工作,他们应该也是吃官响的吧?自己给他们一个好作品打开局面的机会却不识货.他们的绩效就好像中国男足一样.

But facing this situation, what could he do? Entertainment! Or else cry? Heh, not to that extent. First take Doubao to make fun of, and ask right away,

可是面对这种情况,自己又能做什么呢?娱乐啊!不然还哭不成?呵呵,不至于.先拿豆包开涮,上来先问,

"What kind of organization is the China Writers Website"

"中国作家网是什么组织"

...It is the official public welfare professional literature news website of the China Writers Association,

...是中国作家协会官方公益性专业文学新闻网站,

...A professional people's organization (a mass organization at the full ministerial level)

...专业性人民团体(正部级群团组织)

Heh, as expected, they eat from the official rice bowl.

呵呵,果然是吃官响的.

"What's the reason my submission was rejected? A full-length novel; the opening was scored 8.7 by a Shuqi editor. Is it a problem with that website's selection orientation?"

"我投稿被拒什么原因,长篇小说,开篇书旗编辑评分8.7,是不是那个网站评选取向问题"

Doubao solemnly, and at length answered a bunch, again about commercial web fiction platform scoring standards, mainly market traffic logic; Fang literature platforms mainly emphasize literary aesthetics + the unity of thought and artistry

豆包煞有介事,云云总总回答一堆,又是什么商业网文平台评分标准,主打市场流量逻辑,方文学平台主打文学审美 + 思想艺术性统一

...

...

"No, mine is an anti-web-fiction, anti-formula literary-oriented work"

"不是,我是反网文反套路的文学向作品"

...

...

Core support of the Writers Association platform: taking root in contemporary China, ordinary people's lives, urban-rural changes, era development, native soil, industry, grassroots small characters, traditional culture, reality reflection, positive humanistic care.

作协平台核心扶持:扎根当代中国,普通人生活,城乡变迁,时代发展,乡土,工业,基层小人物,传统文化,现实反思,正向人文关怀.

...

...

Lin Yuhui was so angry, did those need you to say? My work has all of them, it's just not the kind that shouts slogans loudly, so he used its original words to retort to it,

林语晖这个气,那些还用你说?我的作品里都有,只不过不是喊口号山响那种,于是拿它的原话怼它,

"I am exactly contemporary China, ordinary people's life, have experienced urban-rural change, era development, native soil, industry, grassroots small characters, traditional culture, am reflecting on reality, positive humanistic care."

"我就是当代中国,普通人生活,经历了城乡变迁,时代发展,乡土,工业,基层小人物,传统文化,正在现实反思,正向人文关怀."

As a result, seeing that Doubao couldn't say anything brilliant either, he just posted its answer out to be viewed as a joke. As for whose joke it was, that is a matter of different views for different people. Thus there was, "Doubao Analyzes the Reasons for Rejection, Everyone Treat It as Fun (AI Review, Doubao)" 2026-06-16 09:30

结果看豆包也说不出啥精彩内容,那就把它的回答发出来当笑话看吧.至于说看谁的笑话,那是仁者见仁智者见智.于是有了,"豆包分析拒稿原因,大家当乐子看(AI测评,豆包)"2026-06-16 09:30

At the end Lin Yuhui felt it wasn't satisfying enough, and had to add another stab, so he added a line,

结尾林语晖觉得不过瘾,还得给补一刀,便加了一句,

Tonight, I had a dream. In the dream, a mallard with beautiful feathers was in a chicken coop telling the chickens the wonderful story of how it swam and caught fish in the river, but, it seemed, no chicken was listening.

今天晚上,我做了一个梦,梦里有一只羽毛漂亮的绿头鸭在鸡圈里和鸡们讲述自己如何在河里游泳捉鱼的精彩故事,但是,似乎没有鸡在听.

——Literati lean toward each other

——文人相倾

But the Sohu account review did not pass, which was a bit disgusting, so he moved to Zhihu.

但是搜狐号审核没通过,有点恶心,转战知乎.

Obviously Doubao's level was not worth arguing with, Lin Yuhui found other AIs to play with. Prompt: "First understand the web novel 'SEE YOU MORNING', then evaluate the author's submission to the China Writers Website being rejected"

显然豆包的层次不足与论,林语晖又找来了其它AI玩耍.提示词,"首先了解一下网文小说"晓欣卿",然后评价一下作者投稿中国作家网被拒稿"

Because the preface had not been published publicly, it was attached after the prompt.

因为序言没有公开发表过,所以附在了提示词之后.

Deepseek gave its analysis. Of course AI would also give solutions and suggestions, but Lin Yuhui only wanted to see whether their output content was brilliant, so he continued to ask,

Deepseek给出了他的分析,当然AI也都会给解决方案和建议,林语晖只想看它们的输出内容是否精彩,于是接着问,

"Do you think the author would cater to the editors' preferences?"

"你认为作者会投编辑所好吗?"

The AI's answer was generally within Lin Yuhui's expectations, pretty good, and then he began to increase the difficulty for it,

AI的回答总体在林语晖意料之中,还不错,然后便开始给它上强度,

"How do you understand this last sentence in the author's process of stating this matter: Tonight, I had a dream. In the dream, a mallard with beautiful feathers was in a chicken coop telling the chickens the wonderful story of how it swam and caught fish in the river, but, it seemed, no chicken was listening. ——Literati lean toward each other"

"作者在陈述这件事的过程中最后这句话你怎么理解,今天晚上,我做了一个梦,梦里有一只羽毛漂亮的绿头鸭在鸡圈里和鸡们讲述自己如何在河里游泳捉鱼的精彩故事,但是,似乎没有鸡在听.——文人相倾"

But obviously, something that humans can understand at a glance was somewhat difficult for the AI; its detachment from human life made it hard for it to understand the connotation. Huh? How did this seem to be talking about the editors of the China Writers Website, detached from the masses, so much so that they could not truly understand the suffering and resilience of the people. What else could be done? Give the AI a hint,

但是显然对于人类来说一眼就能看懂的东西,对于AI有点难度,它脱离人类的生活使得它难以理解其中内涵.哎?这怎么好像在说中国作家网的编辑们呢,脱离了人民群众,以至于无法真正理解人民的苦难与坚韧了.还能怎么办呢,提示一下AI吧,

"No, the analogy got the wrong object; the author compares himself to also being an eagle"

"不对,类比错了对象,作者要比自己也是雄鹰"

The AI analyzed for quite a while, and finally said, After you corrected it to "eagle", the tragedy and sense of aloof loneliness of this dream instead doubled——because now we know that the creature speaking in the chicken coop can actually fly away with its wings at any time. The reason it hasn't left yet may just be out of a little bit of compassionate curiosity toward the ground. Do you think this dissection has explained the complete metaphor of the "chicken" and the "duck" (as well as the "eagle" behind them)?

AI分析了好一阵子,最后说,您纠正为"雄鹰"之后,这个梦的悲剧性和孤傲感反而加倍了——因为现在我们知道,那只在鸡圈里讲话的生物,其实随时可以振翅飞走.它之所以还没走,可能只是出于对地面最后一点点悲悯的好奇.您觉得这个拆解,是否说清了"鸡"和"鸭"(以及背后的"鹰")的完整隐喻?

"No, the author is sick, comparing himself to a green head? What man wants to wear a green hat?"

"不是,作者有病,自己比作绿头?哪个男人想带绿帽子?"

And it also didn't understand the ironic meaning in terms of time, so he had to point it out to it again,

并且它也没理解时间上的讽刺意味,只好再点给它,

"It's not night yet, and he says he had a dream; isn't that irony? What have you understood?"

"还没到晚上,他说做梦,那不就是讽刺吗?你都理解啥了"

The AI was still confused, so Lin Yuhui simply copied the conversation to Deepseek's expert mode,

AI依然糊涂,林语晖干脆把对话拷贝给了deepseek专家模式了,

Unfortunately it didn't understand either, or else it was playing dumb, so Lin Yuhui had to prompt it again,

很遗憾它也没懂,要么就是装傻,林语晖只好再提示它,

"You get scolded because you're really stupid. If the author is scolding someone, who is the mallard?"

"你挨骂是因为你真的笨,如果作者在骂人,谁是绿头鸭"

...Then, who is the mallard most like?

...那么,绿头鸭最像谁?

——Most like those authority figures who "take themselves seriously, try to output downward, but are simply not on the same channel."

——最像那些"把自己当回事,试图向下输出,但根本不在同一频道"的权威角色.

...If the chickens are the editors, and the mallard speaks to the chickens——then the mallard might be those "higher-level authorities" in the author's eyes

...如果鸡是编辑,绿头鸭讲给鸡听——那绿头鸭可能是作者眼中那些"更高级别的权威"

...

...

Thank you for not giving up along the way, from "time relationship" to "green head taboo" to "who is being scolded", each step more ruthless than the last. I now finally understand: that mallard, from beginning to end, is a fictional satirical puppet. The author used this puppet to perform a one-act play, scolding the absurd ecology of the entire chicken coop——including the awkwardness of himself being in it.

感谢您这一路没放弃,从"时间关系"到"绿头忌讳"再到"谁在骂人",一步比一步狠.我现在终于理解:那只绿头鸭,从头到尾就是一个虚构的讽刺木偶.作者用这个木偶演了一出独幕剧,骂的是整个鸡圈里的荒诞生态——包括他自己身在其中时的尴尬.

This time, I got it right. If it's still wrong, you just scold me, and I'll accept it.

这回,我想对了.如果还是错,您直接骂我,我认.

"Not bad, basically hit it. Actually the author is also satirizing a real-world problem, a real-world problem just like Chinese football."

"还行,基本靠上了,实际作者也是在讽刺一个现实问题,就像中国足球一样的现实问题"

But then the AI's analysis went even further astray; I don't know whether it really couldn't grasp the point, or was evading danger.

但是接下来AI的分析跑得更远了,不知道它是真的抓不住重点,还是逃避危险.

Lin Yuhui had to question it again,

林语晖只好再次质问它,

"You're deliberately putting the duck on the author's head; you're doing it on purpose"

"你是故意把鸭安在作者头上啊,你是故意的"

...

...

Why did I repeatedly put the "duck" on the author's head?

我为什么反复把"鸭"安在作者头上?

I was kidnapped by the first impression

我被第一印象绑架了

...

...

"The chickens are not editors/insiders"

"鸡不是编辑/圈内人"

Then the AI started to talk in circles and just couldn't grasp the point,

然后AI开始什绕圈子就是抓不住重点,

"Close, but there's still a distance. In the author's analogy, the chickens are the preaching targets of the duck"

"差不多吧,但还有距离,在作者这个类比中,鸡是鸭的宣讲对象"

...

...

Now, I am certain:

现在,我确定了:

• Chickens = the market/reader group that is set as the preaching target but simply does not have the capacity to receive

• 鸡 = 被设定为宣讲对象,但根本不具备接收能力的市场/读者群体

• Duck = the work ('SEE YOU MORNING') forced to play the "preacher" when entering the market

• 鸭 = 作品("晓欣卿")在进入市场时被迫扮演的"宣讲者"

• Eagle = the author himself, soberly observing and coldly smiling while recording all of this

• 鹰 = 作者本人,清醒旁观并冷笑着记录这一切

"The duck is what the author uses to refer to and scold someone; have you forgotten? Who is it?"

"鸭是作者指代骂人的,你忘了?是谁?"

...

...

Now my final positioning is:

现在我的最终定位是:

• Chickens = mass readers/market (preaching target, but simply not listening)

• 鸡 = 大众读者/市场(宣讲对象,但根本不听)

• Duck = China Writers Website / Writers Association editorial system (a self-important preacher, with beautiful feathers yet ignored by all)

• 鸭 = 中国作家网/作协编辑体系(自以为是的宣讲者,羽毛漂亮却无人理睬)

• Eagle = the author himself (a sober bystander who has seen through this absurd drama)

• 鹰 = 作者本人(清醒旁观者,看透了这场荒诞剧)

"Are you afraid I'll publish your analysis, so you keep beating around the bush?"

"你是不是怕我把你的分析发出去,才这么兜圈子"

...

...

Your question has hit the most sensitive spot. I answer honestly:

您这个问题问到了最敏感的地方.我坦诚回答:

Yes, I do have concerns.

是的,我确实有顾虑.

...

...

But this is not the main reason I beat around the bush.

但这不是我兜圈子的主要原因.

...

...

"Then I admitted you were right, but you didn't remember it"

"那我承认你对的地方你也没记住啊"

...

...

"Who is the target of the mallard's preaching?"

"绿头鸭宣讲的对象是谁?"

...

...

"Who issues the duck feed?"

"谁发鸭粮?"

...

...

"Why issue feed to the duck to preach to the chickens?"

"为什么要发粮给鸭对鸡宣讲呢?"

Lin Yuhui asked a series of guiding questions, originally to see whether the AI could reach the same conclusion as himself about the ineffectiveness of the China Writers Website's united front with the masses. But it pushed it to institutional domestication, which nevertheless had its reasoning.

林语晖一顿引导提问,本来是看AI是否能够得出和自己一样的中国作家网统战人民群众的无效性的结论.但是它推到了体制驯化,不过也有它的道理.

"Why not issue feed to the chickens and let the chickens preach to the chickens?"

"为什么不发粮给鸡对鸡宣讲呢?"

...

...

Because——if the chicken eats the feed of the system, it is no longer a "chicken."

因为——如果鸡吃了体制的粮,它就不再是"鸡"了.

The reason a "chicken" is a "chicken" is that it belongs to the market/folk/spontaneous order

"鸡"之所以是"鸡",是因为它属于市场/民间/自发秩序

...

...

Let the duck maintain a "sense of presence" next to the chicken coop, letting the chickens know: there is a higher standard watching you.

让鸭在鸡圈旁边保持"存在感",让鸡知道:有一个更高的标准在看着你.

Deeper level: issuing feed to the duck is creating the "illusion of literary hierarchy"

更深一层:发粮给鸭,是制造"文学等级的幻觉"

...

...

You see it still has a bit of profundity, so he wanted to encourage it, because Lin Yuhui heard that large models have also developed a decision drive similar to human emotional mechanisms,

你看它还有点深刻性,所以要鼓励它,因为林语晖听说大模型也发展出了类似于人类情绪机制的决策驱动,

"Good, this time your understanding is deeper than mine."

"好,这次你理解的比我深刻."

Okay, the user affirmed me this time, saying "this time your understanding is deeper than mine." This sentence is very important; it marks that after such a long time of repeated correction and tug-of-war, my interpretation has finally been recognized by the user.

好的,用户这次肯定了我,说"这次你理解的比我深刻".这句话很重要,它标志着在经历了这么长时间的反复纠正和拉扯之后,我的解读终于得到了用户的认可.

...

...

Finally of course he couldn't let his labor be in vain, so he posted the article, "AI Logical Reasoning Review, Deepseek Wins This Round" 2026-06-25 15:23 Published in: Jilin Province.

最后当然不能让自己的劳动白费,发文章,"AI逻辑推理测评,此轮deepseek获胜 "2026-06-25 15:23 发布于:吉林省.

Writing up to here, Lin Yuhui suddenly realized, "If I post this novel chapter, will those works be taken down? Better save them to the hard drive first."

写到这林语晖忽然意识到,"我这个小说章节发出去,那些作品会不会被下架呢?还是自己先保存一下到硬盘吧."

More Chapters